L'Eglise Aristotelicienne Romaine The Roman and Aristotelic Church

[Fenice]

I received the letter and I was wondering... does the Nunciature respond in the name of the Curia? or...?
_________________

[Adonnis]

I also received this letter.

I think the Nunciature can respond on behalf of the Curia. What do you think, sister?



Fenice a écrit:

I received the letter and I was wondering... does the Nunciature respond in the name of the Curia? or...?

_________________

.....Cardinal-Presbyter of Saint Anthony of the Portuguese / Grand Audiencier of the Holy See / General Inquisitor of Portugal
...............Primate of Portugal / Metropolitan Archbishop of Braga / Bishop of Vila Real / Duke of Monte Real

[Fenice]

Yes, I think so, do our Brothers and Sisters agree? this was my question.
_________________

[Kalixtus]

The Nutiatura does not speak on behalf of the Curia, it is a papal institution and speaks for the Holy See.

But of course the document can have the signature of both the Nutiatura and the Dean and be approved by the Curia, provided the drafting comes from one of you two I am sure we will all have a good work to read.

_________________

[Roderic_]

In my opinion, it should be the Nunciature alone that should respond. Simple, it was an endorsement of the Roman Church, not the Curia.
_________________

[heldor]

brothers.. why do you want to complicate your life?

The Nunciature is the diplomatic corps of the Church and has always made diplomatic agreements with the various states! He negotiates, tries to make the Rulers or Councilors understand where they have made any mistakes.

Then it is up to the Holy Father and the Curia, under his wise guidance, to give the diplomatic guidelines and endorse, or not, the agreements made. But the signature of the Chancellor of the Nunciature, or of the local Apostolic Nuncios by his delegation, has full force on diplomatic treaties.

This has always been, at least since Sistus reigns, a period that did not begin the day before yesterday, is it not?
_________________
+S.Ecc.Ill.ma frà Tebaldo Foscari detto Heldor il randello
Cardinale Vescovo Emerito di San Domenico in Burgos
Primate delle Venezie e Stato da Mar
Legato Apostolico per le Venezie e Stato da Mar
Patriarca Metropolita di Venezia
Arcivescovo Sine Cura di Gorizia
Padre Generale dell'Ordine di San Domenico,
Conte di Sezze
ecc.

[Francesco_maria]

"We're arguing in vain... and wasting time as usual. If there is consent, this letter of thanks should be sent to this province. We already have few faithful if we don't even consider those who show us their fidelity in these stormy times, what image of the Church do we give?

Whether it is the Nunciature or the Dean of the Sacred College, the only thing that is fundamental is to say that the Holy Church sincerely thanks them and blesses them always encouraging them to remain faithful to the Dogma and the True Faith."
_________________

[Felipe...]

I think it is appropriate that the Nunciature should reply to Gascony, but as Brother Francesco says, it should be done as soon as possible, cause our slowness is often perceived as inattention.
_________________

_______.______Sanctae Mariae Rotundae cardinalis episcopus | Archiepiscopus Burdigalensis
__________..Secretarius brevium ad Principes | Sanctae Sedis Vice-cancillarius et Magnus Auditor

[Kalixtus]

Aye time is ticking - but i just don't want to hear the nuciature is working for the curia that is not true and must be corrected.

_________________

[Fenice]

Brother Kalixtus, the Nunciature has already written on behalf of the Church and of the Curia on other occasions, why not now? and what do you think would be the right way?

Other advices?
_________________

[Kalixtus]

both signed - dean and you. As i said.

The Nuciature can do things by itself without the consensus of the Curia. You are in need to fulfil the wishes of the Pope not of the Curia you are not the servent of the Curia.

The Dean speaks for Curia thats his job.

This case is crossing both areas so it can be done together - than everything is d'accord.

_________________

[Ettore_Asburgo_D'Argovia]

I agree with the words of Cardinal Felipe.

_________________
+ Ettore Asburgo D'Argovia
Cardinale-Presbitero di San Barnaba a Ripa
Decano del Tribunale della Rota Romana
Ufficiale dell'Ordine pontificio di Nicola V

[Sixtus]

Since it appears that the Duke sent his announcement to every living being in Rome we also received it and replied to thank him personally, but a more official communication on behalf of the Church would naturally be welcome if it doesn't come to the next Duke.
_________________

Eskerrik asko Iñési sinaduragatik

[Fenice]

Dear Brothers and Sisters, I offer you the text of the official response. If you approve it, we will add the 'formal' part.
But I think it is important to emphasise that we should also thank all the other States that have publicly expressed themselves in favour of Aristotelian orthodoxy, and which the Primate of France has already mentioned: Béarn, Alençon, Champagne, Maine, Normandy, Lyonnais Dauphiné, Bourbonnais-Auvergne. We could also think about concretely rewarding the nobles and rulers of these lands, don't you think?
Anyway, if we decide to write a document for Gascony, we must not forget the others. Or do we write one document for all of them together?

[pamelita]

+1
_________________