 |
L'Eglise Aristotelicienne Romaine The Roman and Aristotelic Church Forum RP de l'Eglise Aristotelicienne du jeu en ligne RR Forum RP for the Aristotelic Church of the RK online game 
|
Voir le sujet précédent :: Voir le sujet suivant |
Auteur |
Message |
Fenice Cardinal


Inscrit le: 19 Déc 2010 Messages: 12305
|
Posté le: Jeu Jan 12, 2023 9:56 pm Sujet du message: Empire, again |
|
|
Dear Brothers and Sisters, unfortunately the Empire continues on its path contrary to Dogma and the Church. On this road it is supported and accompanied by rulers who show that they consider secular laws to be totally superior to religious ones.
I present to you an up-to-date report.
The Duchess of Savoy, Tiffany de Belle-Rivière known as Thibali, presented a request to the Imperial Court concerning the legitimacy of the concordat between Savoy and the Church. The question was whether there were any violations of imperial law in the concordat.
The Court issued a ruling on 1 January 1471, listing the articles of the concordat that went against the Bulla Aurea and the Magna Charta.
With skill, the Court concluded the ruling by stating that the concordat and the cited articles were not null and void, but were inapplicable. Note the subtlety worthy of an experienced lawyer.
The judgment was made by Etienne Cyprien Hull Amenediel de Mortelane, Hélie di Leostilla, Telfusa Cortéz D'Oria Caracciolo, Nicolo Leone Arnod Sforza (Dagyar II), Georien von Connacht and Findecano de Brancion.
My final considerations are these: so far, there has been no reaction from other rulers, and this ruling will not prevent us from continuing our diplomatic meetings to update or write new concordats. However, this ruling sets a dangerous precedent, which will make future discussions even more difficult and perhaps lead to negative outcomes.
I enclose a copy of the ruling.
Citation: | [center]~Imperial Court of Justice~
Decision of the Imperial Court
Case 1470-014 Concordat Tully Farnese[/center]
File number: 1470-014
Subject of request: Conflict with legislation
Applicant: [char]Thibali[/char], Duchess of Savoy
The Imperial Court has received a request with respect to a conflict of legislation by Tiffany de Belle-Rivière, Duchess of Savoy, concerning the legality of Savoy's provincial Concordat (Concordat Tully Farnese) with respect to (1) The Magna Carta of the Holy Roman Empire and (2) The Bulla Aurea of the Holy Roman Empire. The Imperial Court deems itself competent to consider this request, following Imperial Law of Justice §5(3):
Citation: | (3) The Imperial Court is furthermore responsible for juridical or constitutional conflicts between the Empire and its provinces or unions of provinces. |
Following the request of Tiffany de Belle-Rivière, Duchess of Savoy, the Imperial Court examined the litigious parts of the Concordat Tully Farnese, a provincial concordat, and whether or not they respect the superior legislations (Imperial Magna Carta and Imperial Bulla Aurea). "Superior" here refers to the hierarchy of legislation that is imposed in Magna Carta Chapter V, article II:
Citation: | Article II – The Magna Carta is above any other law, whether imperial or local. The hierarchy of the legislation within the Empire is as outlined in the following invariable sequence: Magna Carta, imperial laws, imperial decrees, treaties and concordats on the imperial level and the legislation of the Imperial States. |
As such, a provincial concordat being provincial legislation, its provisions must respect provisions of the imperial Magna Carta and imperial laws, including the Bulla Aurea. Following Imperial jurisprudence in case 1469-009, the Imperial Court recalls that the Imperial Court has no authority to impose the amendment or striking down of a state legislation (i.e. royal or provincial), but can only note that some or all of its provisions are illegal with respect to imperial legislation. If it is the case, these provisions cannot be applied as long as a superior law exists and contradicts them. If a state legislation is still applied despite being contradictory to imperial legislation, this should be viewed as an act of High Treason under Chapter VI, article V of the Magna Carta " the conscious refusal of recognition of the Emperor, his government or imperial legislation".
On what concerns the Concordat Tully Farnese, after examination:
The Imperial Court determines that Article I.4.a of the Concordat of Savoy violates Article VII (3) of the Bulla Aurea.
The Imperial Court determines that Article II.3 of the Concordat of Savoy violates Article VII (11) of the Bulla Aurea.
The Imperial Court determines that Article III.1 of the Concordat of Savoy violates Chapter I Article X of the Magna Carta and Article VII (5) of the Bulla Aurea.
The Imperial Court determines that Article IV.4 of the Concordat of Savoy violates Article VII (12) of the Bulla Aurea.
The Imperial Court determines that Article IV.5 of the Concordat of Savoy violates Article VII (12) of the Bulla Aurea.
The Imperial Court determines that Article VI.4 of the Concordat of Savoy violates Article VII (13) of the Bulla Aurea.
The Imperial Court determines that Article VI.5 of the Concordat of Savoy violates Article VII (13) of the Bulla Aurea.
Summary:
The request has been actively examined by Imperial Judges Etienne Cyprien Hull Amenediel de Mortelane, Hélie di Leostilla, Telfusa Cortéz D'Oria Caracciolo, Nicolo Leone Arnod Sforza (Dagyar II), Georien von Connacht and Findecano de Brancion. The Imperial Court concludes that articles I.4.a, II.3, III.1, IV.4, IV.5, VI.4, VI.5 of the Concordat of Savoy, called "Concordat Tully Farnese", signed on the 21st of January 1464, violate the Magna Carta and the Bulla Aurea.
Given the violations against the currently valid imperial legislation, the Imperial Court concludes that the aforementioned articles cannot be applied.
An application, knowingly or unknowingly, which violates the valid imperial legislation is chargeable with High Treason according to Magna Carta Chapter VI Article V.
Finally, the Imperial Court emphasizes that it neither declares the concordat in its entirety nor the articles null and void, but simply determined that these articles cannot be applied.
In case of change of the currently valid imperial legislation, the articles might become applicable in the future.
Written, signed and sealed in Strasbourg on the 1st of January 1471.
|
_________________
 |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
 |
Urbain_mastiggia Cardinal


Inscrit le: 19 Mai 2017 Messages: 2700
|
Posté le: Ven Jan 13, 2023 5:46 pm Sujet du message: |
|
|
- Helie di Leostilla is a priest of our Church. _________________
 |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
 |
Francesco_maria Cardinal


Inscrit le: 14 Jan 2013 Messages: 3830
|
Posté le: Ven Jan 13, 2023 7:29 pm Sujet du message: |
|
|
"From the point of view of the Empire it seems to me that the answer is correct and legitimate. It is up to us to evaluate this signal and reflect on our role in society and reconsider the role of the Holy Church in the Kingdoms." _________________
 |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
 |
Sixtus Pape


Inscrit le: 03 Juil 2014 Messages: 4157 Localisation: Sur les rives du Tibre
|
Posté le: Sam Jan 14, 2023 5:57 pm Sujet du message: |
|
|
Sadly, this is not the first time the imperial court has intervened against a concordat; even more sadly, this will likely not be the last.
This occurrence once again shows the need for a widespread and stable presence, both ecclesiastical and diplomatic, in Aristotelian territories. The lack of shepherds and ambassadors is as urgent as ever.
Without continued contact with our faithful and their secular rulers, we will not be able to convey Church teachings and, as in this case, pressure local rulers to follow them.
Let us not forget that, while these judgments are passed by the imperial court, they are requested by provincial regents and the imperial judges themselves are selected by the imperial diet. _________________
Eskerrik asko Iñési sinaduragatik |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
 |
Adonnis Cardinal


Inscrit le: 19 Jan 2018 Messages: 5125 Localisation: Monte Real/Leiria - Palazzo Taverna/Roma
|
Posté le: Lun Fév 13, 2023 6:40 am Sujet du message: |
|
|
Brothers, this matter is still pending.
Opinions? _________________
.....Cardinal-Presbyter of Saint Anthony of the Portuguese / Grand Audiencier of the Holy See / General Inquisitor of Portugal
...............Primate of Portugal / Metropolitan Archbishop of Braga / Bishop of Vila Real / Duke of Monte Real |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
 |
Pie de Valence Cardinal


Inscrit le: 04 Nov 2012 Messages: 7806 Localisation: Langres/Joinville
|
Posté le: Lun Fév 13, 2023 11:13 am Sujet du message: |
|
|
FR : Je redis ce que j'ai déjà dit plusieurs fois. La solution est dans la séparation de l'Eglise et de l'Etat. Après cette séparation, chacun se mêle de ses affaires et l'intervention de l'Etat dans les affaires de l'Eglise devient illégitime.
IT : Ripeto ciò che ho già detto più volte. La soluzione sta nella separazione della Chiesa dallo Stato. Dopo questa separazione, ognuno si intromette nei propri affari e l'intervento dello Stato negli affari della Chiesa diventa illegittimo.
ANG : I repeat what I have already said several times. The solution lies in separation of Church and State. After this separation, everyone gets involved in his affairs and the intervention of a State in the Church's affairs becomes illegitimate. _________________ "Le modernisme n'est ni une dérive, ni une horreur, ni une maladie honteuse. C'est le terreau de la rénovation de l'Eglise, la terreur des conservateurs, l'air pur qui vivifiera la foi" (Pie II de Valence)
"On n'est jamais dans le mensonge quand on prêche la paix et l'apaisement, toujours quand on prêche la haine d'autrui" (Pie II de Valence) |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
 |
Adonnis Cardinal


Inscrit le: 19 Jan 2018 Messages: 5125 Localisation: Monte Real/Leiria - Palazzo Taverna/Roma
|
Posté le: Mer Fév 15, 2023 8:19 pm Sujet du message: |
|
|
Is there any news of the outcome of this matter, Sister Fenice? _________________
.....Cardinal-Presbyter of Saint Anthony of the Portuguese / Grand Audiencier of the Holy See / General Inquisitor of Portugal
...............Primate of Portugal / Metropolitan Archbishop of Braga / Bishop of Vila Real / Duke of Monte Real |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
 |
Francesco_maria Cardinal


Inscrit le: 14 Jan 2013 Messages: 3830
|
Posté le: Mer Fév 15, 2023 8:25 pm Sujet du message: |
|
|
Pie de Valence a écrit: | ANG : I repeat what I have already said several times. The solution lies in separation of Church and State. After this separation, everyone gets involved in his affairs and the intervention of a State in the Church's affairs becomes illegitimate. |
"This is new for me. Last I checked kingdoms and Church have always been separate, and bound by agreements. I don't understand what you mean card. Pie." _________________
 |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
 |
Fenice Cardinal


Inscrit le: 19 Déc 2010 Messages: 12305
|
Posté le: Mer Fév 15, 2023 10:15 pm Sujet du message: |
|
|
We have the first consequence in imperial territory after the publication of the law on so-called civil unions.
I have been discussing a new concordat with the Duchy of Modena - for such a long time that I no longer remember when we started.
The Duchy does not accept the articles concerning Aristotelian marriage as the only valid form of union. I had to rewrite them to find a formulation that does not betray Dogma and at the same time circumvents the objections of the pro-imperialists.
We shall see if they are accepted; in the meantime, the Duke has changed for the umpteenth time. _________________
 |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
 |
Pie de Valence Cardinal


Inscrit le: 04 Nov 2012 Messages: 7806 Localisation: Langres/Joinville
|
Posté le: Mer Fév 15, 2023 10:58 pm Sujet du message: |
|
|
Francesco_maria a écrit: | Pie de Valence a écrit: | ANG : I repeat what I have already said several times. The solution lies in separation of Church and State. After this separation, everyone gets involved in his affairs and the intervention of a State in the Church's affairs becomes illegitimate. |
"This is new for me. Last I checked kingdoms and Church have always been separate, and bound by agreements. I don't understand what you mean card. Pie." |
Separated means that the State no longer interferes in religious decisions and that the Church no longer interferes in the affairs of the State. More kings, more counts appointing bishops because it is interference. More church to dictate the conduct of secular affairs in a state. _________________ "Le modernisme n'est ni une dérive, ni une horreur, ni une maladie honteuse. C'est le terreau de la rénovation de l'Eglise, la terreur des conservateurs, l'air pur qui vivifiera la foi" (Pie II de Valence)
"On n'est jamais dans le mensonge quand on prêche la paix et l'apaisement, toujours quand on prêche la haine d'autrui" (Pie II de Valence) |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
 |
|
|
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum
|
|